|
|
Preaching at San Francisco
Rathayatra
By Narasimha das

Due to Lord
Caitanya’s mercy, manifest specifically as Gaura Karuna, my
wife’s enthusiasm to preach, we went to San Francisco this
summer to Jagganath Rathayatra to distribute Srila Prabhupada Siddhanta
and meet interested newcomers to Krishna consciousness.
Fortunately we were able to meet several of Srila
Prabhupada’s true followers and others who were innocent
newcomers. Almost everyone we met was appreciative of the
Srila Prabhupada Siddhanta book, and some came back later to tell us
how much they liked the book.
This type of preaching in
close proximity to deviated cults is always risky for various reasons,
yet we felt unaffected by their association and freely distributed our
books and spoke to new persons interested in Krishna
consciousness. Only one man, a GBC devotee, challenged my
wife. Later I went to ask what his objections were and he immediately
challenged me, demanding to know my initiated name and the place and
date of my initiation.
In the vitiated iskcon group,
there are many who place great importance on the formalities of
initiation. Devotees are judged according the year and even month of
initiation and whether it was done before or after 1977 and whether
one's so-called “guru” is a big man in iskcon or
just a small-time upstart. After assuring this man I was
initiated by Srila Prabhupada directly, he told me his
objections:
“Srila Prabhupada ordered all of his disciples to initiate
thousands of their own disciples,” he ranted.
“There is
no such instruction or order anywhere,” I replied.
“Srila
Prabhupada never ordered or even discussed a new system of initiations.
He never discussed new diksa-gurus for his mission. He never explained
how new diksa-gurus would be nominated or approved. He never talked
about how many gurus would be worshipped and served by their disciples
in iskcon. To the contrary, he asked that none of the procedures he had
established for iskcon should change. In fact, he formally issued an
order to maintain the already current system of ritvik
initiations.”
“That’s
just your opinion!” he said desperately, looking around, as
if for help from the gathering crowd.
“No. We have the
order in writing with Prabhupada’s signature,” I
explained.
“Srila
Prabhupada ordered it to be sent to all iskcon temples and leaders. You
must know that. This July 9th, 1977 order reasserts and makes official
the system of ritvik initiations, which had been a standard practice in
iskcon since 1970. He never suggested this practice should be
discontinued. The present system of gurus and initiations in iskcon is
a fabrication,” I said.
“That’s
not true…” he stammered.
“It
was Lord Caitanya’s order that everyone should become gurus
and preach,” he continued.
“We need to be gurus
by becoming genuine preachers of the actual science of Krishna
consciousness,” I said and cited the example of Sri Gadadhara
Pandit, who refused to initiate Vallabha Bhatta, saying He could not do
so without a direct order from Lord Caitanya. (See Caitanya-caritamrta,
Antya 7.150, 7.151).
I read from Srila Prabhupada
Siddhanta, where Srila Prabhupada says, “A guru can become
guru when he is ordered by his guru. Otherwise nobody can become
guru.” (Conversation, October 28, 1975, Nairobi) [cited in
Siddhanta, 3.11 pg.45].
“Please listen to
Prabhupada’s words,” I asked, and read again from
Srila Prabhupada Siddhanta: “Why did this Gaudiya Matha fail?
Because they tried to become more than the guru. He--before passing
away--he gave all direction and never said that ‘This man
should be the next acarya.’ But these people--just after his
passing away, they began to fight: ‘Who shall be
acarya?’ That is the failure. They never thought,
‘Why--Guru Maharaja gave us instruction on so many
things--why did he not say that this man should be acarya?’
They wanted to create artificially somebody as acarya, and everything
failed.
“They did not
consider even with common sense--that ‘If Guru Maharaja
wanted to appoint somebody as acarya, why did he not say? He said so
many things, and this point he missed? The real point?’ And
they insisted upon it. They declared some unfit person to become
acarya. Then another man came. And then
another—‘Acarya!’
Another—‘Acarya!’ So better remain a
foolish person perpetually to be directed by Guru Maharaja. That is
perfection. And as soon as he learns that Guru Maharaja is dead,
‘Now I am so advanced that I can kill my guru and I become
guru.’ Then he's finished.” (Conversation, August
16, 1976, Bombay) [cited Siddhanta 3.11, pg. 44]
The GBC devotee
said, “How do you know Srila Prabhupada will accept someone
as a disciple? He used to personally accept every disciple and send a
letter.”
“Srila Prabhupada
made it abundantly clear what the standards are for being counted as
his disciple,” I said. “On several occasions he
said a person could be initiated into Krishna consciousness just by
reading his books and doing service sincerely for his
mission.”
I told a story about an Indian
lady who died when her sari caught fire while helping in the temple
kitchen. She had never been formally initiated, and the devotees were
lamenting about this fact. After hearing about this lady -- how she had
always served faithfully and chanted 16 rounds daily -- Srila
Prabhupada proclaimed, “She is the best of my
disciples.”
“But, still, how do
you know Srila Prabhupada will accept a particular new devotee as his
disciple today?” the man protested weakly.
“He always accepted
everyone if they agreed to follow his instructions. Why are you trying
to create doubts about this? The real doubt is why leaders in iskcon
will not accept all of Srila Prabhupada instructions absolutely? If we
create poisonous doubts for new devotees about their opportunity to
accept Srila Prabhupada as their direct personal savior, as their
eternal guru and guide, what kind of disciples are we? How do you know
Srila Prabhupada accepts you, still?”
“I got a
letter,” he said.
“Does he still
accept you? Have you always followed him perfectly? Do you offer
everything you eat? How do you know Prabhupada accepts your offerings
still, today,” I asked.
The man looked doubtful and said nothing.
“Such doubts are
atheistic," I said.
“He told us how to
offer food,” someone else said.
“Similarly, he told
us how new devotees are formally accepted by him for
initiation,” I explained. I read again from Srila Prabhupada
Siddhanta, citing passages where Srila Prabhupada explains the system
of ritvik initiations in conversations and letters in May, June, and
July 1977 and again on October 18th of 1977, just days before his
disappearance pastime.
Several people had now
gathered. Another man, dressed as a GBC grhastra devotee, who had been
sitting with the other GBC devotee the whole time,
said, “You are preaching
Krishnanity. This is not Prabhupada’s
philosophy!”
I again read from Srila
Prabhupada Siddhanta, a passage where Srila Prabhupada affirms that
Christians can attain perfection by accepting and following Lord Jesus
Christ simply through reading the Bible “represented by some
priest or clergyman.” (See Lecture, Seattle, Oct. 2 1968),
[cited Siddhanta 2.E, pgs. 15, 16 ]
I explained, “Srila
Prabhupada never condemned Christians because they accept only Jesus
Christ as guru. Rather he appreciated their loyalty to Jesus
but condemned their neglect of his instructions.”
At this point the so-called
GBC grhastra devotee cynically said, “Prabhupada knew nothing
about Christianity before coming to this country.”
Hearing this insane statement,
even this other GBC devotee looked at his friend in disbelief and said,
“Are you crazy? Prabhupada knew
everything. He was a pure devotee from
birth.”
Finally we agreed on
something.
“Srila
Prabhupada taught us all, Christian priests and scholars included, who
is Christ and what is Christianity. You think Prabhupada needed to
learn about Christianity from his neophyte Christian
disciples,” I asked.
I decided it was
time to leave. Obviously I was speaking to confused and/or
poisoned individuals. I asked the first GBC devotee to state his
objections in writing after carefully reading the book. I
assured him that I would be glad to correspond with him. I
walked away.
His face twisted in scorn, he
called after me, “You’re just envious!”
After several weeks, he still hasn’t contacted me.
Fortunately, while I wasted
time with misguided doubters and nonbelievers, great souls like Gaura
Karuna, Nanda Priya, Gauridas Pandit, Mahashringa, Jaya Narayana,
Madhua and others actually distributed many Siddhanta books to
interested and appreciative devotees.
I continued to distribute
books openly in front of miskcon leaders, as various promoters of
deviant gaudiya matha cults canvassed openly for new converts. One
former disciple and book distributor for Prabhupada, posing as a guru,
sat pompously in a chair with followers holding umbrella over his head
and sitting at his feet. Miskcon leaders present there had no
objection, and almost everyone completely ignored this group.
Unfortunately the umbrella was printed in full on top with a likeness
of Lord Jagganatha’s face. Some GBC miskcon followers were
peddling these at a booth, and no one seemed to care that people were
using the Supreme Lord’s face as a shield from rain, sun, and
bird droppings.
One miskcon bouncer wannabe
who had been harassing Prabhupada preachers in LA, told me I
couldn’t distribute the Siddhanta books at the
gathering.
“This book glorifies
Srila Prabhupada and all great Vaisnavas,” I explained.
“These are all quotes from Prabhupada’s books. If
you harass our distributors, you’ll suffer.”
I walked away. After
that, he avoided even looking my way and never said a word to any of
our distributors. I gave Srila Prabhupada Siddhanta to at least three
members of miskcon’s phony guru club, including one of the
original eleven. They all thanked me for the book and seeing the
self-effulgent cover, touched it to their heads and promised to read it
and comment.
After nearly four months and
thousands of copies of Srila Prabhupada Siddhanta distributed, no one
has dared to state in writing any objections to any points of
philosophy or sadhana in this book. Genuine devotees accept it
completely and others, perhaps, have at least some inclining that this
book is a manifestation of Srila Prabhupada’s mercy and
can’t be challenged by anyone, without severe
reactions.
Home
|